The FAA’s largest-ever organizational overhaul creates a dedicated office for advanced aviation technologies, a centralized safety management organization, and an airspace modernization office—all with implications for how AAM, drones and BVLOS operations are integrated into the NAS.

The FAA has announced a sweeping reorganization of its internal structure that for the first time puts advanced aviation technologies, including advanced air mobility (AAM), unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and even supersonic aircraft, under a single top-level office.
Unveiled in a January 27 press release by Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy and FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford, the overhaul is described as “the largest in the agency’s history” and is framed as part of the FAA’s Flight Plan 2026 strategy to strengthen safety oversight and modernize the National Airspace System (NAS).
The move comes against the backdrop of intense scrutiny of FAA safety performance, including an upcoming National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) hearing on the 2025 collision between an Army helicopter and an American Airlines jet near Washington National Airport. Reuters reports that the restructuring is intended in part to consolidate safety oversight and improve hazard identification after criticism that the FAA failed to act on years of close-call data.
For the drone and autonomy community, three elements stand out: creation of an Office of Advanced Aviation Technologies, a new Aviation Safety Management System (SMS) Organization, and an Airspace Modernization Office responsible for a multibillion-dollar revamp of air traffic control.
Three new top-level offices
According to the FAA announcement, the new structure adds three major organizations:
- An Airspace Modernization Office, required by the 2024 FAA Reauthorization Act, responsible for planning, R&D, systems engineering and portfolio management for NAS modernization, including what the administration is branding the “Brand New Air Traffic Control System.”
- An Aviation Safety Management System (SMS) Organization, which will lead an agency-wide safety management system and centralize safety management functions previously spread across five lines of business.
- An Office of Advanced Aviation Technologies, designated as the point for activities related to integration of “advanced aviation technologies including Advanced Air Mobility, Unmanned Aircraft Systems, and supersonic aircraft” in the United States.
The reorg also consolidates finance, IT and HR under an Administration and Finance Office, and moves strategic policy, legal and rulemaking under a unified Policy and Legal Office.
FAA and DOT stress that the changes will not result in reductions in force. Instead, they are presented as a way to streamline decision-making, give permanent status to key leadership roles, and align the internal chart with Flight Plan 2026’s three pillars: people, safety and NAS modernization.
Advanced Aviation Technologies as a focal point
For the uncrewed and AAM sector, the most visible change is the creation of the Office of Advanced Aviation Technologies.
In the FAA’s description, this office will be “the designated point for activities related to the integration of advanced aviation technologies including Advanced Air Mobility, Unmanned Aircraft Systems, and Supersonic aircraft in United States,” consistent with the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 and recent presidential executive orders.
That language places drones and AAM in the same strategic bucket as other transformative technologies, and moves their integration work to a top-level office alongside traditional air traffic operations and commercial space transportation. While the FAA has not yet publicly detailed how existing entities such as the UAS Integration Office, AAM programs, or UTM initiatives will be mapped into this new structure, the reorg clearly signals that advanced operations are no longer treated as side projects.
Industry will be watching to see whether the new office becomes the programmatic home for work on the Part 108 BVLOS framework, AAM corridor planning, DFR/advanced operations and UTM, or whether it functions more as a coordinating hub across existing lines of business.
A single SMS organization and what it means for UAS
The new Aviation Safety Management System Organization is the other major structural change with implications for drones and autonomy.
Per the FAA, this office will “implement a single safety management system (SMS) and risk management strategy for the entire FAA,” replacing siloed safety metrics and processes with an agency-wide approach.
The FAA has been promoting SMS for years through advisory circulars and outreach, defining it as a formal, top-down approach to managing safety risk across four components: safety policy, safety risk management, safety assurance, and safety promotion.
Bringing that into a single organization matters for uncrewed and AAM operations because:
- Safety data from UAS incidents, BVLOS trials and advanced operations should now feed into the same risk-assessment machinery as traditional manned operations.
- Systemic hazards—such as patterns in near-midair incidents involving drones, or common failure modes in BVLOS detect-and-avoid architectures—can be treated as cross-cutting issues rather than niche topics.
- Future rulemaking and policy for drones and AAM may lean more heavily on SMS-style hazard analysis and mitigations, potentially shifting how waivers, exemptions and type certifications are justified.
None of this changes the current operational rules overnight, but it does change where and how the underlying data and risk models are handled inside the agency.
Airspace modernization and the successor to NextGen
The third leg of the reorg, the Airspace Modernization Office, is tasked with modernizing the NAS and managing the portfolio for the so-called Brand New Air Traffic Control System—effectively the successor to the long-running NextGen program, whose standalone office is being wound down under prior legislation.
For uncrewed systems, this is the office that will be steering the technical and architectural work on future ATC infrastructure, including data links, surveillance, automation and potentially UAS traffic management interfaces. While the FAA’s public materials do not name UTM or remote ID in this context, the fact that airspace modernization is now its own top-level office underscores that UAS and AAM integration are likely to be treated as integral to NAS design rather than bolt-on features.
Implications for drones, AAM and BVLOS
From a UAS perspective, the immediate regulatory landscape does not change with the reorg. Existing rules for Part 107, waivers, DFR, and the pending Part 108 BVLOS framework remain where they are in the pipeline.
However, the organizational plumbing behind those efforts has shifted in ways that are likely to matter over the next several years:
- Advanced aviation technologies now have a clearly labeled home at the top of the FAA’s chart, which may give AAM and UAS integration work more visibility and budgetary weight within Flight Plan 2026.
- Safety data and risk modeling for drones and advanced operations will be centralized in the SMS Organization, giving regulators a broader base of evidence—good and bad—when evaluating BVLOS approvals, corridor concepts and AAM operations.
- Rulemaking and policy activities, including future UAS and AAM rules, are now explicitly housed in the Policy and Legal Office, which is supposed to oversee strategic policy, stakeholder engagement and financial assistance. That could affect how quickly and coherently new rules move, and how they are aligned with congressional direction in the 2024 reauthorization.
At the same time, the reorganization is clearly driven by safety and political pressure following the Reagan National collision and years of NTSB warnings about systemic risk. The new SMS and Advanced Aviation Technologies offices will be expected to show that they can both enable innovation and prevent the kinds of blind spots that led to that accident.
For uncrewed and AAM stakeholders, the near-term action item is simple: follow how leadership appointments, org orders and program realignments play out under these new boxes—and watch closely how the FAA chooses to use this new structure as it finalizes BVLOS rules and AAM integration plans.

